FILL ‘ER UP:

Borderlands: H.L. Mencken’s Struggle With Faith (Kevin Belmonte, September 6th, 2026, Imaginative Conservative)

Part of the answer lies with one essay in the collection. Mencken called this piece “Holy Writ,” and that caught my eye too. Written in 1923, it’s a reflection on the King James Bible. I’d heard Mencken could be unsparing when he wrote about matters of religion. Would he be so here?

There were one or two caustic flashes, but then, this essay seemed strangely subdued. It had lines that were different from anything I’d read by Mencken before. Many of the things he said struck a chord; indeed, they were welcome. Here’s one of them, in which he describes the adamantine beauty and power of the KJV:

To this day it has enchanted the English-speaking peoples so effectively that, in the main, they remain Christians, at least sentimentally. Paine has assaulted them, Darwin and Huxley have assaulted them, and a multitude of other merchants of facts have assaulted them, but they still remember the twenty-third Psalm when the doctor begins to shake his head, they are still moved beyond compare (though not, alas, to acts!) by the Sermon on the Mount, and they still turn once a year from their sordid and degrading labors to immerse themselves unashamed in the story of the manger.

It is not much, but it is something.

Just a few sentences later, Mencken says something that was, as Alistair Cooke had written, “beautifully lucid.” He begins with qualified admiration for the Catholic Church, but closed with words of unqualified praise. “The Latin Church,” he says, “has always kept clearly before it the fact that religion is not a syllogism, but a poem.”

I thought about that for a long time. I think about it still.

Which led to these thoughts.

Maybe Mencken’s caustic prose, along with his stirring passages, flowed from a longing for truth and beauty and ultimate answers. Maybe sometimes we rage against things that aren’t what they ought to be, things that are broken and ugly. Maybe Mencken’s fulminations pointed to “the God-shaped hole in our heart,” as someone once said, or is supposed to have said. Maybe an uneasy believer like him, or someone who wants to believe, can teach us something. I believe that’s true.

THE LEGEND LIVES ON:

What exactly are the gales of November? And is November 10 really ‘early’ for them? (Greta Kaul, 11/10/2021, Minneapolis Post)

By definition, a gale — of November or otherwise — occurs when wind speeds reach between 34 and 47 knots, or roughly 40 to 54 miles per hour.

When gales occur on Lake Superior, they’re typically caused by a weather phenomenon called a mid-latitude cyclone.

“The cyclone part, that’s anytime you have strong winds circling in counterclockwise around a low-pressure system,” said John Swenson, an associate professor at the University of Minnesota-Duluth’s Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences. Swenson has spent a lot of time watching Lake Superior react to changes in the weather; he grew up on the lake and talked to MinnPost from his childhood home, where he now lives.

The mid-latitude cyclone is basically the equivalent of a less-powerful continental hurricane. On a satellite, it even looks a lot like a hurricane. “You get the spiraling winds. Very beautiful, aesthetically, but kind of apocalyptic,” Swenson said.

Mid-latitude cyclones cover much larger areas than tropical cyclones, but they’re less intense. “They fill up basically the entire continent of North America, to some extent, when they’re fully developed” Swenson said. “Their winds are not as strong but if you’re on the lake they’re still plenty strong.”


Mid-latitude cyclones get their energy from the difference in temperature between two large air masses — a cold, dry mass to the north, and a warm, wet mass in the south. In the fall, the relative — emphasis on relative — warmth of the lake water adds fuel to the system. The mid-latitude cyclones that congregate over Lake Superior tend to form in the Four Corners region of Colorado, before intensifying and moving northeast, causing strong winds, Swenson said.
On average, the center of the storms that form in this part of the country pass just south of Lake Superior. As a result, the winds are very strong over the lake, which also presents little in terms of obstacles for the wind, generating huge wave fields, Swenson said — and gales.

Wind makes big and unpredictable waves. A lot of factors determine how big the waves on the lake are, including where the wind is coming from and how far it blows across the lake. But waves nearly 30 feet high have been recorded on Lake Superior.


Great Lakes waves, furthermore, are a lot different than ocean waves, because they’re mostly driven by wind, compared to tidal-driven ocean waves, said Matt Zika, warning coordination meteorologist at the National Weather Service’s Marquette, Michigan office. On the ocean, you often count seven or eight seconds between waves.


“Wind-driven waves on the Great Lakes, the period in between those waves is much shorter. And so it may only have a couple of seconds before the next wave comes rolling in. On top of you. So it’s a different environment than a lot of what you see on the ocean,” he said.

The gales of November come early


But when it comes to Superior gales, is November 10 really early, as Lightfoot claims at the end of his song’s first verse?

IMAGE-BEARER:

Tishomingo Burn Ban (Paul Rankin, Southlands)

Guided by those stars, I was working up to a story about how difficult it had been for me at that age—how alone I’d felt and how I was here for him—when the stranger’s headlights appeared, blinding me and making shipwreck of whatever I might have said. He might as well have parked his truck between us.

As he climbed out, I called a greeting.


Twitchy, the man kept glancing over but said nothing, only lowered the tailgate and rolled out a sleeping bag in the bed.

The light was poor and my eyes were dazzled with spots from the headlights, but I could see he was clean-cut, mid-thirties, sporting a lime-green polo tucked into chinos.

I asked Fish if he wanted another s’more. More hot chocolate? But he was preoccupied now, too, watching the man.

After he’d inflated an air mattress, the stranger approached and began to make stilted small talk. Some weather we’ve been having, right? You believe how hot and dry it’s been? We could sure use the rain. Even factoring for the dim lighting, his face had a hard-to-see quality. A vagueness about the eyes and mouth. I couldn’t quite bring him into focus but noted he was older than I’d thought, hard-worn with deep crow’s feet, hollow eyes, and some rough, puckered scarring along his jaw, as if someone had gone at him with a cheese grater.

“Nice night, anyway,” he said.

“Yes,” I said. A low crescent moon. A billion stars with a skein of clouds gathering. “Beautiful.”

The man grimaced, then turned to Fisher. “This your father?” he asked.

Fish looked at me, nodded yes.

“Good-looking kid,” he said, keeping his eyes on the boy like we were discussing a horse he’d considered buying.

“Cocoa?” I said, wishing more than ever for that fire. A focal point, a gathering place to swap stories about where we’d come from and where we might be going. “Or tea?”

“Pass.”

I killed the gas flame and asked where he was from, but he didn’t answer.

He stood clenching and unclenching his fists, as if he’d come to deliver some shattering news and couldn’t quite find the words. Then, in a rush, he asked: had we been washed in the precious blood of the Lamb?

I balked. The simplest answer was yes, but the question felt as intrusive as his arrival. As I hesitated to give it to him straight, he began to rephrase the question in various ways: Had we invited the Lord into our hearts? Had we been born again? If we died tonight, would we spend eternity in heaven with Jesus or in the fiery torments of hell with Satan and all his minions?

I considered asking how this was his business—or maybe teasing him a little. Saying something about our friend Jesús and how he’d been tutoring us in Spanish. But in the end, not wanting to provoke him or prolong the exchange, I only said, yes. Yes, we did know the Lord. Fairly well, as a matter of fact. I was, at the time of this encounter, ordained as a Ruling Elder in a Presbyterian Church, where I’d also taught Bible classes, written liturgies, and developed curricula for small groups.

I thought that would be the end of it, but the stranger appeared dubious, even a little distressed. “Presbyterian?” He scowled. “Where’s the church?”

“Jackson,” I said.

His perplexed frown stretched taut, as if I’d said we hailed from Gomorrah.

I almost felt bad for him then. Here he’d come prepared to save our souls, and I’d gone and ignored the script.

The more I affirmed my faith, the more suspicious the man became, as if he hadn’t come to share the good news but to catch us in a damnable lie. As the interrogation persisted, I couldn’t help thinking of how Flannery O’Connor once described the South as a Christ-haunted place. I love Jesus, but, good Lord, his ostensible followers can be irksome and even sinister at times. Clearly unconvinced by my profession of faith but out of ideas—or maybe just weary with the effort—the stranger finally walked the three steps back to his camp site.

SOCIAL CONTAGION IS THE REAL EPIDEMIC:

The term is becoming unrecognisable’: have the experts who believed in a single autism spectrum changed their minds?: There has been a steep rise in the number of people labelled autistic over the last 20 years. Is that down to greater understanding – or overdiagnosis? (John Harris. 1 Nov 2026, The Guardian)

Back in March, Dame Uta Frith – she was honoured with the title seven years ago – gave an interview to TES magazine (formerly the Times Educational Supplement) scattered with stark pronouncements. Among them was a claim that the so-called autistic spectrum has “gone on being more and more accommodating”, to the point that it “has come to its collapse”. Then, in August, she published a piece in the academic journal Psychological Medicine claiming autism was in dire danger of being turned from a “precise, clinical” term into a “vague, culturally amplified identity category”.

What she said has inevitably added to the cacophony of political and media noise about rising autism diagnoses. In the UK, there was a 787% increase between 1998 and 2018, with the rise greater for women than men, and the single biggest jump among adults; credible American stats have shown an increase across the whole population of 175% between 2011 and 2022, with the largest rise occurring among 26- to 34 year-olds (in both countries, childhood rates have also leapt up). Once, Frith agreed with the idea of a broad autistic spectrum; now, she has come to the conclusion that many people diagnosed as adults are so different from the autistic people whose condition becomes obvious in their early years and have learning disabilities that most of the former group do not merit the label “autistic” at all.

“Some of them, I think, are being wrongly influenced by social media to believe that they’re autistic, because it’s a possible way to explain your difficulties,” she tells me.

the desire to seem ill rather than disordered is perfectly understandable, but medicine aught not play along.

MAGA WAS WOKE 2.0:

MAGA Finally Gets What It Deserves (David French, Nov. 5, 2026, NY Times)

It is difficult to overstate the sheer arrogance of Trump and his remaining MAGA base. They treated the rest of the people of this country as if they were of no consequence.

Actually, it’s worse than that. They treated the rest of the country as if they were enemies.

To the voters who longed for peace, he gave them a unilateral, undeclared war.

To the families seeking relief from high prices, he gave tariffs.

To the voters alarmed about corruption in Washington, he made the swamp so corrupt that barons of the Gilded Age are regretting that they were born in the wrong era.

To the new Hispanic Republican voters who helped Trump win and transformed the Republican coalition, he gave brutal racial profiling and pogroms in the streets of Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles and other cities.

To voters who were weary of intolerance and cancel culture, he delivered a wave of censorship unseen since Woodrow Wilson imprisoned his political opponents by the hundreds.

To voters who wanted stability in the world, he gave fractured alliances and embraced Vladimir Putin, the world’s deadliest and most dangerous dictator.

And then, when dissenting Americans — including dissenting conservatives — condemned these outrages and cried out for relief, they were treated with contempt and rage.

The cancel culture of the MAGA right inflicted immense cruelty on its enemies, and MAGA relished their pain.

LUCAS HAD THEM AT MIDICHLORIANS:

Keep An Eye on the Right’s ‘Anakinmaxxing’ Argument Against Elections: The Star Wars memes may be silly, but the authoritarian message they convey is deadly serious. (Thomas Lecaque, November 5, 2026, Religion Dispatches)

If you’re not familiar with the Star Wars prequels, that’s Anakin Skywalker on the throne, flanked on the left by Padme Amidala and on the right by little Luke and Leia, with the Imperial Guard and stormtroopers in the background. To anyone who has seen Star Wars it’s blithering nonsense; to anyone who hasn’t, it’s incredibly weird blithering nonsense. And it isn’t just Elon Musk pushing Anakin memes. Many on the Right find them appealing. The question is: Why on earth did anyone think AI slop from the Star Wars prequels was a useful political message in the lead up to the election? The answer—that it wasn’t about winning elections so much as rejecting them—lies in the narrative of the Star Wars prequels.

Spoiler alert (from last millennium): Anakin Skywalker, the hero of the terminally-online Right, becomes Darth Vader, a Dark Jedi who overthrows the Republic and puts the Emperor on the throne, butchers people indiscriminately, and betrays his friends to follow the Dark Side. Along the way he murders a bunch of children and kills his wife for the sake of a creepy old man who grooms children (Emperor Palpatine). While he is at times humanized, Anakin Skywalker is clearly the villain of the film series.

And this is what Elon Musk considers a positive mirror of Western Civilization.

Like Anakin, MAGA is defined by its fears.

CONSERVATIVE, NOT TRUMPIST:

Why a Merciless Supreme Court Rebuke on Election Eve Matters (Adam Liptak, Nov. 5, 2026, NY Times)


On the day before the midterm elections that would transform American government, the Supreme Court also did something extraordinary. In the space of about seven hours on Monday, it evaluated and rejected an emergency request from the Trump administration to let it meddle in how ballots were counted in California.

The court did so without even asking the other side for a response, something I don’t recall ever happening in connection with an emergency application from the Justice Department. The court’s order, issued Monday evening, was just one sentence long, and no member of the court had anything to say in dissent.

The court’s merciless rebuke reminded me of its treatment of a lawsuit filed by the state of Texas in 2020 after President Trump lost the election that year. It asked the justices to throw out the results in four battleground states carried by Joe Biden.

UNDO TRUMPISM:

Top Reforms for the New Democratic Congress: End Corruption, Restore Democracy (Larry Diamond, Nov 5, 2026, The UnPopulist)

Three questions loom large:

What can and must be done to repair the damage to democracy and minimize the danger that an aspiring autocrat can once again severely degrade if not destroy American democracy?

What will the Democrats do to respond to voters’ concerns about high consumer prices, diminishing job opportunities, decaying infrastructure, and unaffordability of housing and other key components of a middle-class life?

What will be the political approach of a new Democratic majority? Will they try to build new coalitions from the center out that win over some Republican members of Congress, or will they meet polarization with polarization by trying to force through legislation with narrow majorities, even if it requires eliminating the Senate filibuster?

The Democrats’ new majorities are considerable, but they fall well short of the 1932 landslide that handed FDR New Deal supermajorities. That means the winning hand for Democrats will be to widen their base and, wherever possible, seek broader coalitions for policy innovation and reform.

A TIME TO LEGISLATE AND INVESTIGATE:

Now’s a Good Time to End Bad Immigration Policies (David J. Bier, 11/04/26, Cato)

Among many other policies, Republicans and the Trump administration:

Pre-funded ICE for the entirety of Trump’s term, avoiding oversight or any potential limits on mass deportation;

Appropriated nearly $250 billion for immigration enforcement—more than all other federal law enforcement combined and a decade of funds in two years;

Cut legal immigration in half, including for spouses and minor children of US citizens—with legal immigration cuts far exceeding cuts to illegal immigration;

Diverted 25,000 law enforcement officers from human and sex trafficking, terrorism, and violent crime investigations into civil immigration enforcement;

Turned every agency of the executive branch into arms of its immigration agenda—from the DOJ and IRS to the Department of Transportation and US Postal Service;

Deprioritized criminals in deportation efforts and increased arrests of people without criminal history, including spouses of US citizens;

Pursued immigration enforcement efforts with an unprecedented degree of violence, which involved shooting dozens of people;

Violated the Constitution in numerous ways, including by arresting noncitizens for their speech and invading private homes of US citizens without warrants;

Engaged in open and explicit demographic and racial profiling of Hispanic Americans on US streets—which is occurring at both the federal and state levels.

Accountability Day: America’s midterms confirm there really can be punishment for lies, incompetence and corruption – and that while money talks it cannot drown out the truth (Bill Emmott, November 5, 2026, Asia Times)

[I] think we can say two big things with confidence.

The first is that after two years of impunity for him and all the people around him, this vote will mark the beginning of the restoration of accountability, especially for corruption and other law-breaking but also for the spending of public money.

Actual prosecutions will be impossible for as long as the Department of Justice is under Trump’s control, but congressional investigations and hearings are sure to start laying the groundwork for prosecutions in two years’ time – a process which will itself have a deterrent effect.

“Lawyer up” will be the right advice for any business that has bought access to Trump over the past two years in return for contracts or regulatory benefits, and even more so for anyone who has had their snouts in the extraordinarily open trough of domestic and foreign corruption. You know who you all are.

SMAUG DESOLATED:

Demography is destiny: China will grow old before it gets rich: China is aging like Japan with far poorer consumers, bringing on a silver economy long before it gets a premium one (Anthony Fox, November 4, 2026, Asia Times)

China will experience aging far worse than Japan has, because Chinese consumers are not rich enough. One Japanese in five was over 65 by 2005, a mark China will reach in 2032.

At that point, Chinese consumers will spend per person about three-fifths of what Japanese consumers spent in 2005, at purchasing power parity. China will also have fewer people of working age, with the number of Chinese aged 15 to 64 falling by a quarter by 2050, from 990 million today to about 745 million, a 245 million person decrease.

On the contrary, those 65+ will rise from 214 million to 390 million. This fall in the working-age population means that an increasing share of spending will be done by consumers who are not in the workforce. Today, one in seven yuan spent is by someone above the age of 65.

By 2050, that will be one in every three yuan. Most of those older Chinese will live on modest budgets.